Comments on: Lead Provider Playoffs

By: leadgen101

leadgen101 — Tue, 20 May 2008 16:01:41 +0000

I agree with Bill that zipsearch should be up there.

By: Bill Rice

Bill Rice — Mon, 19 May 2008 20:04:29 +0000

Come on LeadCritic we are all okay with ZipSearch playing–we’re voting not you.

Open one more bracket with ZipSearch v. GetSmart and you solve both comments. And LeadPoint should have to go up against RootMarkets and Reply! just to make it fair.

Open the field:) Awesome idea. Very creative!

By: Lead Critic

Lead Critic — Mon, 19 May 2008 17:37:30 +0000

I don’t want any thought of there being unfair play. Plus, there are number of providers I left off. Depending on how this goes I will put together another playoff and have the two winners compete in the finals.

By: leadgen101

leadgen101 — Mon, 19 May 2008 17:22:50 +0000

I’m curios why zipsearch was not included on this list?

By: Lead Critic

Lead Critic — Mon, 19 May 2008 17:18:32 +0000

They were picked randomly from my memory…no hat or method. Simply listed a handful of providers I could think of off the top of my head.

By: leadgen101

leadgen101 — Mon, 19 May 2008 17:12:40 +0000

You mention the providers were picked randomly, please explain. Were the names thrown into a hat or what?

By: Lead Critic

Lead Critic — Mon, 19 May 2008 15:12:22 +0000

HA!
Well Warren, the providers were picked randomly, however I did choose all short form lead providers . I think it would be safe to say that LT is in a category by itself, but I will add them if people would like me too.

By: warren

warren — Mon, 19 May 2008 14:25:16 +0000

Hoe does industry titan lowlender make the playoffs and LendingTree not?