<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LendingTree Pricing Clarification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leadcritic.com/company-news/lead-providers/lendingtree-pricing-clarification/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/company-news/lead-providers/lendingtree-pricing-clarification</link>
	<description>The Home for Lead Industry News &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajiny</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/company-news/lead-providers/lendingtree-pricing-clarification/comment-page-1#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>ajiny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/lendingtree/lendingtree-pricing-clarification#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>Looks like they are less confident about the quality of their leads if they are shifting to getting a much higher percentage of revenue from the lead charges rather than the closing participation.  Trying to insulate themselves from any declines in overall closing percentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they are less confident about the quality of their leads if they are shifting to getting a much higher percentage of revenue from the lead charges rather than the closing participation.  Trying to insulate themselves from any declines in overall closing percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
