<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tree Logo, You Vote.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leadcritic.com/featured/tree-logo-you-vote/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-generation/featured/tree-logo-you-vote</link>
	<description>The Home for Lead Industry News &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lead Critic</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-generation/featured/tree-logo-you-vote/comment-page-1#comment-287638</link>
		<dc:creator>Lead Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/?p=721#comment-287638</guid>
		<description>I am with you Lead Buyer and think LT is up to some very good things and understand the idea of rebranding and separating the two, because they are totally different. I am just don&#039;t like the look and think this web 2.0 look isn&#039;t quite right. I also like the elegant look of the LT logo and think the could have possibly blended elegance and cutting edge technology together to have a different logo. 

But listen, its just my two cents and something to talk about. I am sure it will work just fine, regardless of my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you Lead Buyer and think LT is up to some very good things and understand the idea of rebranding and separating the two, because they are totally different. I am just don&#8217;t like the look and think this web 2.0 look isn&#8217;t quite right. I also like the elegant look of the LT logo and think the could have possibly blended elegance and cutting edge technology together to have a different logo. </p>
<p>But listen, its just my two cents and something to talk about. I am sure it will work just fine, regardless of my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A lead buyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-generation/featured/tree-logo-you-vote/comment-page-1#comment-287627</link>
		<dc:creator>A lead buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/?p=721#comment-287627</guid>
		<description>Mike I do like the traditional LT logo and voted that way however they are trying to draw a distinction between LT and Tree I think.  As they enter new verticals I am guessing the same thing that works in lending won&#039;t work in Edu or Insurance.

That being said I also like the new logo as well.  I am actually pretty happy with the current direction Tree.com is taking now that Doug is back.  Their recent hire of Mark Fowler is a good one in my mind and some of their major projects are good ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike I do like the traditional LT logo and voted that way however they are trying to draw a distinction between LT and Tree I think.  As they enter new verticals I am guessing the same thing that works in lending won&#8217;t work in Edu or Insurance.</p>
<p>That being said I also like the new logo as well.  I am actually pretty happy with the current direction Tree.com is taking now that Doug is back.  Their recent hire of Mark Fowler is a good one in my mind and some of their major projects are good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morelli</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-generation/featured/tree-logo-you-vote/comment-page-1#comment-287543</link>
		<dc:creator>Morelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/?p=721#comment-287543</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll break from convention. I like the new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll break from convention. I like the new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
