<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LeadsCon, Lead Management Session</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session</link>
	<description>The Home for Lead Industry News &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lead Generation Industry, You Asked We Delivered &#124; Lead Marketwatch</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/comment-page-1#comment-24713</link>
		<dc:creator>Lead Generation Industry, You Asked We Delivered &#124; Lead Marketwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/leadscon/leadscon-lead-management-session#comment-24713</guid>
		<description>[...] LeadsCon 2008, there was a lot of interest in closing the loop between lead generation and lead management performance data&#8211;seen as a critical success factor for online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LeadsCon 2008, there was a lot of interest in closing the loop between lead generation and lead management performance data&#8211;seen as a critical success factor for online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Parekh</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/comment-page-1#comment-24560</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Parekh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/leadscon/leadscon-lead-management-session#comment-24560</guid>
		<description>I agree with &#039;A lead buyer&#039; about the fact that we will also need to work with our clients to make sure we have the proper permissions to use that data we have on our systems. I pretty sure I caveated my statements about this issue with a similar statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with &#8216;A lead buyer&#8217; about the fact that we will also need to work with our clients to make sure we have the proper permissions to use that data we have on our systems. I pretty sure I caveated my statements about this issue with a similar statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Parekh</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/comment-page-1#comment-24559</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Parekh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/leadscon/leadscon-lead-management-session#comment-24559</guid>
		<description>I think Jeff makes a good point, but I thought the spirit of the panel discussion was to show the willingness to work with lead providers and third party analytics services providers to help improve &#039;lead quality&#039;. We all realize there is a lot of strategic discussions yet to be had about how the data is to be utilized and what specific data we can share. 

I am just looking forward to having these discussions with our partners toward a goal that I believe benefits the entire industry. I think will continue to demonstrate the significance of Lead Management in the entire lead life-cycle. 

I really enjoyed the panel. I think it was well established that lead management is the hub for understanding how best practices affect conversions and  behavior at the point of sale. The reality is that currently the lead management systems are better positioned than the lead exchanges to understand the factors that influence the quality of the lead. What&#039;s great is that we can immediately start making an impact by working more closely with the lead generation side of the fence, and to that extent I think it behooves us all to work together. 

Thanks again Jay W. for all your hard work. You threw a smashing show. Michael, thank you for your moderation of the panel and general involvement in this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jeff makes a good point, but I thought the spirit of the panel discussion was to show the willingness to work with lead providers and third party analytics services providers to help improve &#8216;lead quality&#8217;. We all realize there is a lot of strategic discussions yet to be had about how the data is to be utilized and what specific data we can share. </p>
<p>I am just looking forward to having these discussions with our partners toward a goal that I believe benefits the entire industry. I think will continue to demonstrate the significance of Lead Management in the entire lead life-cycle. </p>
<p>I really enjoyed the panel. I think it was well established that lead management is the hub for understanding how best practices affect conversions and  behavior at the point of sale. The reality is that currently the lead management systems are better positioned than the lead exchanges to understand the factors that influence the quality of the lead. What&#8217;s great is that we can immediately start making an impact by working more closely with the lead generation side of the fence, and to that extent I think it behooves us all to work together. </p>
<p>Thanks again Jay W. for all your hard work. You threw a smashing show. Michael, thank you for your moderation of the panel and general involvement in this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeadsCon: Internet Lead Market Up-close : Lead Marketwatch</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/comment-page-1#comment-24555</link>
		<dc:creator>LeadsCon: Internet Lead Market Up-close : Lead Marketwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/leadscon/leadscon-lead-management-session#comment-24555</guid>
		<description>[...] LeadCritic Leadscon Recap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LeadCritic Leadscon Recap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A lead Buyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/comment-page-1#comment-24553</link>
		<dc:creator>A lead Buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/leadscon/leadscon-lead-management-session#comment-24553</guid>
		<description>LC great to finally meet you at Leadscon.  Your session was the best of the conference.  It would have been great if it was 2 or so hours as the gloves may have really come off.  It was clear that these companies are passionate about what they do and that is a great thing for the industry.

I agree that the LMS companies missed the boat on the analytics piece.  Sparkroom (contrary to the overriding opinion of the LMS companies) has a great product.  The LMS&#039;s should consider becoming partners with Ebureau and Sparkroom as it would sure provide added functionality for their user bases.  As a large lead buyer who uses one of the solution on the panel for a small portion of our business it would make whichever solution went this route much more attractive as an enterprise solution.

Jeff as for your comments about data…As a buyer I agree that my system providers need my permission to share data but during the conference you seemed to suggest that you wanted to monetize the deliver of the data back to the lead aggregator/provider/exchange  Did I misunderstand what you said?  Assuming I am not misquoting you I think that this is short sighted.  Providing data to the providers will only improve the quality and therefore my efficiency as a buyer.  I can only see this as a benefit you as you are here to facilitate my sales process so I don’t see the hesitation or concern other than the need to get client approval.  Yes you need to make sure that your data is good (as you mentioned at the conference numerous times) but if its not I think it suggests a bigger problem with the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LC great to finally meet you at Leadscon.  Your session was the best of the conference.  It would have been great if it was 2 or so hours as the gloves may have really come off.  It was clear that these companies are passionate about what they do and that is a great thing for the industry.</p>
<p>I agree that the LMS companies missed the boat on the analytics piece.  Sparkroom (contrary to the overriding opinion of the LMS companies) has a great product.  The LMS&#8217;s should consider becoming partners with Ebureau and Sparkroom as it would sure provide added functionality for their user bases.  As a large lead buyer who uses one of the solution on the panel for a small portion of our business it would make whichever solution went this route much more attractive as an enterprise solution.</p>
<p>Jeff as for your comments about data…As a buyer I agree that my system providers need my permission to share data but during the conference you seemed to suggest that you wanted to monetize the deliver of the data back to the lead aggregator/provider/exchange  Did I misunderstand what you said?  Assuming I am not misquoting you I think that this is short sighted.  Providing data to the providers will only improve the quality and therefore my efficiency as a buyer.  I can only see this as a benefit you as you are here to facilitate my sales process so I don’t see the hesitation or concern other than the need to get client approval.  Yes you need to make sure that your data is good (as you mentioned at the conference numerous times) but if its not I think it suggests a bigger problem with the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Solomon</title>
		<link>http://blog.leadcritic.com/lead-management/analytics/leadscon-lead-management-session/comment-page-1#comment-24495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leadcritic.com/leadscon/leadscon-lead-management-session#comment-24495</guid>
		<description>Thanks for leading a great panel Mike; I too heard it was one of the best from the show. I wanted to reiterate my comments regarding metrics reporting to lead providers. As I said at the show, my stance is this. We will not simply open the floodgates and share raw data with our partners. There are questions of confidentiality, data integrity and value creation. We are far along in our analysis of what and how to share data with our partners, but I am committed to doing it right.

Incidentally the reaction that I heard was that of respect for sound business thinking. Sharing customer data with lead providers can be a great thing; everyone could benefit. But it is not something that should be taken frivolously. Doing it right requires some strategic thought, not to mention buy-in from our clients.

The bottom line is we are completely focused on making our customers more successful and we believe that providing accurate data back to lead providers can play significantly in this goal; but only if done correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for leading a great panel Mike; I too heard it was one of the best from the show. I wanted to reiterate my comments regarding metrics reporting to lead providers. As I said at the show, my stance is this. We will not simply open the floodgates and share raw data with our partners. There are questions of confidentiality, data integrity and value creation. We are far along in our analysis of what and how to share data with our partners, but I am committed to doing it right.</p>
<p>Incidentally the reaction that I heard was that of respect for sound business thinking. Sharing customer data with lead providers can be a great thing; everyone could benefit. But it is not something that should be taken frivolously. Doing it right requires some strategic thought, not to mention buy-in from our clients.</p>
<p>The bottom line is we are completely focused on making our customers more successful and we believe that providing accurate data back to lead providers can play significantly in this goal; but only if done correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
